Comparison: Wagner-Denoyer I vs. Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Projection No. 1:

Projection No. 2:

Mode: [ Info ]
Simple
Expert


Creator
Wagner-Denoyer I
	Tobias Jung (2016)
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
	Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group
Wagner-Denoyer I
	Miscellaneous
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
	Lenticular
Property
Wagner-Denoyer I
	Compromise
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
	Equal-area
Other Names
Wagner-Denoyer I
	—
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
	—
Remarks
Wagner-Denoyer I
	My own attempt at map projections. It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer. Generated with Flex Projector. See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
	Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method. Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons
Wagner-Denoyer I
	Denoyer Semi-Elliptical Wagner VII Wagner-Denoyer II Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
	Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).


Creator
Wagner-Denoyer I	Tobias Jung (2016)
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group
Wagner-Denoyer I	Miscellaneous
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Lenticular
Property
Wagner-Denoyer I	Compromise
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Equal-area
Other Names
Wagner-Denoyer I	—
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	—
Remarks
Wagner-Denoyer I	My own attempt at map projections. It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer. Generated with Flex Projector. See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method. Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons
Wagner-Denoyer I	Denoyer Semi-Elliptical Wagner VII Wagner-Denoyer II Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).


Creator
Wagner-Denoyer I	Tobias Jung (2016)
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group
Wagner-Denoyer I	Miscellaneous
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Lenticular
Property
Wagner-Denoyer I	Compromise
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Equal-area
Other Names
Wagner-Denoyer I	—
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	—
Remarks
Wagner-Denoyer I	My own attempt at map projections. It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer. Generated with Flex Projector. See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method. Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons
Wagner-Denoyer I	Denoyer Semi-Elliptical Wagner VII Wagner-Denoyer II Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).

	Wagner-Denoyer I	Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Creator	Tobias Jung (2016)	Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group	Miscellaneous	Lenticular
Property	Compromise	Equal-area
Other Names	—	—
Remarks	My own attempt at map projections. It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer. Generated with Flex Projector. See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.	Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method. Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons	Denoyer Semi-Elliptical Wagner VII Wagner-Denoyer II Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206	Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).