Map projections

Tobias Jung – URL: https://map-projections.net

Comparison: Wagner-Denoyer I vs. Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Projection Selection

Select two projections:

Projection No. 1:

Projection No. 2:

Mode: [ Info ]
Simple
Expert

Or:

→ Selection by thumbnail
→ Select from list

Projection Informations


Creator
Wagner-Denoyer I	Tobias Jung (2016)
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group
Wagner-Denoyer I	Miscellaneous
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Lenticular
Property
Wagner-Denoyer I	Compromise
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Equal-area
Other Names
Wagner-Denoyer I	—
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	—
Remarks
Wagner-Denoyer I	My own attempt at map projections. It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer. Generated with Flex Projector. See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method. Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons
Wagner-Denoyer I	Denoyer Semi-Elliptical Wagner VII Wagner-Denoyer II Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216	Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).

	Wagner-Denoyer I	Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Creator	Tobias Jung (2016)	Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group	Miscellaneous	Lenticular
Property	Compromise	Equal-area
Other Names	—	—
Remarks	My own attempt at map projections. It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer. Generated with Flex Projector. See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.	Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method. Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons	Denoyer Semi-Elliptical Wagner VII Wagner-Denoyer II Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206	Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).

1. Comparison: Physical Map – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner-Denoyer I CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

2. Comparison: Political Map – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner-Denoyer I CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

3. Comparison: Silhouette Map – scaled to fit

Click on projection’s name to hide it
Grey areas: Superimposition of projections

Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map

Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

4. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 30° – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

5. Comparison: Physical Map – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner-Denoyer I CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

6. Comparison: Political Map – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner-Denoyer I CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

7. Comparison: Silhouette Map – scaled to same width

Click on projection’s name to hide it
Grey areas: Superimposition of projections

Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map

Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

8. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 30° – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

9. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 15° – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

10. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 15° – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix

Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA

Tobias Jung Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix CC BY-SA

CC BY-SA