The aim of this assignment is to study one of the following articles:
Codes from immunogeneic_tumor_growth on github can be useful.
Describe the main question addressed in the article: present the general biological setting, and the key mechanismss that are studied in the article. Define all terms that do not have an obvious meaning, for example
Describe the mathematical model or models. Present the variables, parameters and equationss. Describe the biological mechanism modelled by each term in the equations. Simplifications are often made to reduce the original model to a simpler one. List the hypotheses that were made to achieve the simpler model.
List all parameter values in a table (specific values or ranges)
We want to find and characterise the steady states of the model. To preserve biological realism of the model, we are looking for non-negative steady states (0 included).
We now try to establish the phase portrait of the model. To do this, we need first to determine the steady states, and characterise their types: (saddle, node, focus, ...). and their stability. Second, we need to determine the stable and unstable manifolds. In particular, the stable manifold of a saddle will separate the phase space into two part, so that every trajectory is completely contained in one of those parts.
1 Phase portrait with default parameters. Plot the phase protrait with default model parameters. Follow the steps:
For the stochastic models, use the determinic ODE versions to plot characterise steady states and the stable and unstable manifolds. Use the stochastic version to compute the trajectories
You can use or adapt the codes immunogeneic_tumor_growth.m on immunogeneic_tumor_growth.
Choose a key parameter of your system as your bifurcation parameter, which we will call $\lambda$. This can be one used in the article, but you can also choose another one.
Plot the bifurcation diagram for the model, with respect to $\lambda$. If your model has several variables, plot one bifurcation diagram for each variable.
Characterise all the bifurcations you see: saddle-node, transcritical, pitchfork, or Hopf. Are there any other types of bifurcations?
Depending on your model, global bifurcations may occur, such as heteroclinic bifurcations. Try to characterise such bifurcations by plotting the phase portrait before, at, and after the bifurcation.
It can also be interesting to use second bifurcation parameter to follow saddle-node points and see whether they can form a cusp.
If your model is an ODE model, you can re-write it as a birth and death process. To convert the continuous ODE variables $x_1, ..., x_n$ to discrete values, use a reference volume $\Omega$ such that the number each species is $N_i = \Omega x_i$. The volume $\Omega$ is a parameter of the birth and death process you will have to take into account.
You can use or adapt the codes stoch_tumor_growth.m on immunogeneic_tumor_growth.
As discussed in class, the rule-of-thumb for the variability of species numebrs is one over the square root of the mean species number $1/\sqrt{\langle n \rangle}$. Choose the volume $\Omega$ such that the mean numbers are small (10-100) and large (over 1000).
Another possibility is to expand, or simplify the model. Based on the modellling hypotheses listed in exercise 1 and on the discussion in the original article, find a modification to the model that could provide either a more realistic picture of the biological system or a simpler mathematical analysis. Highlight the main differences between the original and the modifief model.